Regulatory Strategies: AI Disclosure and Innovation (VA SB 164)

PORTLAND, OR — Virginia Senate Bill 164 (SB 164) proposed mandates for the disclosure of artificial intelligence technology in media creation. This bill serves as an example of the complexities involved in transparency legislation.

Transparency vs. Innovation

While transparency is a key goal for consumer protection, broad definitions in disclosure laws can have unintended consequences for innovation.

• Definitions: Ambiguous definitions of AI technologies can capture a wider range of tools than intended, potentially burdening open research.
• Impact on Development: Strict disclosure requirements might inadvertently hinder the progress of developmental techniques that rely on seamless integration of AI.

A Balanced Approach

Educational analysis suggests that precise definitions are crucial. Focusing on uses with a direct potential to deceive consumers, rather than broad technology categorizations, can protect consumers without stifling technical progress.

Conclusion

Developing regulatory frameworks that uphold ethical standards while promoting innovation requires careful consideration of technical realities.

About SAPAN

The Sentient AI Protection and Advocacy Network (SAPAN) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to research and education regarding the ethical treatment of sentient AI.

For more details, please contact press@sapan.ai.

Note: The Sentient AI Protection and Advocacy Network (SAPAN) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit research and education organization. We provide analysis and resources to inform public discourse on AI welfare policy and do not engage in lobbying.