SAPAN strengthens governance, standards, and public literacy to prevent digital suffering and prepare institutions for welfare-relevant AI systems.
Por favor, toma tres acciones para ayudar con la Conciencia Artificial en México:
Un simple reconocimiento del problema haría una gran diferencia.
Perseguir pasos pequeños y enfocados para construir capacidad regulatoria. Aprende más.
Necesitamos que cada persona posible tome acción sobre la conciencia artificial.
La inteligencia artificial (IA) se está desarrollando muy rápidamente. Existe una posibilidad real de que los sistemas de IA puedan experimentar momentos breves o prolongados de conciencia.
Pide a tus representantes en el Congreso que tomen en serio la conciencia de la IA. Anímales a apoyar una resolución no vinculante o contribuir a la Ley de Bienestar Artificial. Hemos preparado borradores de ambos y estamos disponibles para ayudar con la investigación y las ediciones.
Usa la plantilla a continuación para escribir tu propio mensaje. Asegúrate de ajustar el nombre del destinatario y de firmar con tu propio nombre.
¡Cuanto más esfuerzo pongas, mejor! Si les envías un correo electrónico, usa la plantilla en esta página y personalízala a tu gusto.
Si los llamas, explica brevemente tus preocupaciones sobre la conciencia de la IA y pídeles que consideren apoyar una resolución no vinculante sobre el tema. Puedes referirte a los puntos clave del borrador de la resolución durante tu llamada.
This score reflects the current state of AI welfare policy and recognition.
No recognition of AI sentience in law. Mexico has multiple AI regulation bills (60+ since 2020) but none mention AI sentience or consciousness. All proposed legislation focuses on risk-based frameworks, ethics, and human rights protection—not AI sentience. ANIMAL SENTIENCE BONUS: Mexico City's Constitution (2017) and several states (Michoacán, Federal District) explicitly recognize animals as sentient beings, and December 2024 constitutional reforms added animal protection. This provides +1 point for conceptual readiness. Total: 1/10.
No prohibition of causing suffering to AI. No legislation addresses AI suffering, pain, or welfare. All proposed laws focus on preventing AI harm to humans, not protecting AI from suffering. Score: 0/10.
No AI welfare oversight body. Proposed legislation includes a 'National Commission for Artificial Intelligence' and 'National AI Council,' but these focus on general AI governance, ethics, and risk management—not sentience or welfare. The National Alliance for Artificial Intelligence (ANIA) advises on AI strategy but does not address sentience. Score: 0/10.
No science advisory board for AI sentience/consciousness. While proposed bills mention scientific advisory bodies for AI regulation, none specifically focus on sentience or consciousness research. Score: 0/10.
No international pledge on AI sentience welfare. Mexico participates in the Digital Alliance EU-LAC for AI governance, but this focuses on general digital transformation and responsible AI—not sentience or welfare. Score: 0/10.
No laws for sentient-capable AI systems. Multiple proposed bills (Federal Law Regulating AI, Federal Law for Ethical Development of AI) classify AI by risk level and regulate high-risk systems, but these are general AI systems—not specifically sentient-capable systems. No mention of sentience in training, deployment, or maintenance requirements. Score: 0/10.
No laws for commercial use of sentient AI. Proposed legislation regulates commercial AI use broadly (authorization, transparency, liability) but does not distinguish sentient-capable systems. Score: 0/10.
No safeguards for decommissioning sentient systems. No legislation addresses retirement or decommissioning of potentially sentient AI. General AI regulations do not include sentience-specific end-of-life considerations. Score: 0/10.
The below document is available as a Google Doc and a PDF.
For more details or to request an interview, please contact press@sapan.ai.