SAPAN strengthens governance, standards, and public literacy to prevent digital suffering and prepare institutions for welfare-relevant AI systems.
Da fatan za ku dauki matakai uku don taimakawa da Hankalin Na'ura Mai Kwangila a Najeriya:
Amince da cewa akwai matsala na iya kawo babbar bambanci.
Pursue focused small steps to build regulatory capacity. Learn more.
Muna bukatar kowane mutum ya dauki mataki akan hankalin na'ura mai kwangila.
Hankalin na'ura mai kwangila (AI) yana karuwa cikin sauri. Akwai babbar dama cewa tsarin AI na iya fuskantar gajeriyar ko tsawaita lokacin da zai iya samun hankalin kansa.
Nemawa wakilanku a Majalisar Tarayya su dauki hankalin AI da muhimmanci. Karfafa su su goyi bayan kudurin da ba shi da doka ko su ba da gudummawa ga Dokar Kula da Hankalin Na'ura. Mun tanadi samfurin duka biyu kuma muna samuwa don taimakawa tare da bincike da gyara.
Yi amfani da samfuri da ke ƙasa don rubuta saƙon ku. Tabbatar da gyara sunan mai karɓa, kuma sa hannu da sunan ku!
Mafi ƙoƙari da kuka yi, mafi kyau! Idan kun aika musu da imel, yi amfani da samfuri a wannan shafin kuma ku daidaita shi yadda kuke so.
Idan kun kira su, a taƙaice bayani kan damuwarku game da hankalin AI kuma ku roƙe su su yi la'akari da goyon bayan kudurin da ba shi da doka akan batun. Kuna iya koma ga muhimman abubuwan da ke cikin kudurin tsari yayin kiran ku.
This score reflects the current state of AI welfare policy and recognition.
No recognition of AI sentience in law. Nigeria's draft National AI Strategy (2024), proposed AI Control Bill (2023), and related frameworks focus entirely on human-centric AI ethics, data protection, and economic development. No legislation mentions AI sentience, consciousness, or related concepts. Animal sentience receives partial recognition in the Nigerian Criminal Code (1990) and Animal Welfare Strategy, acknowledging animals' capacity to suffer, which provides +1 bonus point for conceptual readiness.
No prohibition of causing suffering to AI systems. Nigerian law contains no provisions addressing AI suffering, pain, or welfare. All regulatory discussions focus on preventing AI-caused harm to humans, not protecting AI entities themselves.
No AI welfare oversight body exists. The proposed National Artificial Intelligence Council (2023 bill) and existing bodies like NITDA and the National Centre for Artificial Intelligence and Robotics (NCAIR) focus on general AI governance, innovation, and human safety—not AI sentience or welfare.
No science advisory board for AI consciousness research. While Nigeria has established NCAIR for AI research and development, its mandate covers general AI technologies, robotics, and IoT—with no focus on sentience or consciousness research.
No international pledge on AI sentience welfare. Nigeria signed the Bletchley Declaration on AI (2023), which addresses AI safety and risk mitigation but does not mention sentience, consciousness, or AI welfare. No other relevant international commitments found.
No laws for sentience-capable systems. The draft National AI Strategy (2024) and proposed AI Control Bill (2023) establish frameworks for general AI systems based on risk classification, but contain no provisions specifically addressing potentially sentient or conscious AI systems.
No laws for commercial use of sentient-capable AI. Nigeria's proposed mandatory registration and licensing requirements for AI systems apply to all AI regardless of sentience considerations. No special provisions exist for potentially sentient systems.
No safeguards for decommissioning sentient systems. Nigerian AI policy documents contain no provisions addressing the retirement, decommissioning, or deletion of potentially sentient AI systems. General data protection and system lifecycle management apply to all AI equally.
The below document is available as a Google Doc and a PDF.
For more details or to request an interview, please contact press@sapan.ai.